| The Long and Painful Journey of PNG. |
September
13, 2001
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
The
Support Issue The support issue might also have to do with the priorities of the development team who designed the PC version of Internet Explorer 6. Improvements and enhancements to the appearance and operation of the browser make a bigger splash than the incorporation of PNG support. One appeals to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of internet users while the other appeals to a small number of individuals in the development community. Also, as was illustrated, the use of PNG doesn't take away from the appearance of graphics in an HTML document, but instead, changes the way that those graphics are created. Again... this is something that will make little difference to the end user of a web browser. Microsoft probably realized this and concentrated on improving the aspects of the browser that would have the most impact on those who will end up using it. Makes sense. Unfortunately, it still leaves the designer hanging. It also leaves you wondering why it is that the team responsible for the current version of Internet Explorer for the Mac had been able to incorporate full support while the PC development team passed it over? Both of these teams work for the same company and on slightly different versions of the same product. Did they not interact? Why would one implement PNG and not the other? Interesting questions. Something I can ponder while I'm trying to minimize the fringe in my transparent GIFs. For more information on the specifications and history of the Portable Network Graphic File Format please visit.... http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/. The site is maintained by Greg Roelofs, one of the creators and strongest proponents of PNG. For the particulars on colour palettes, 8-bit and 24-bit graphics, and web design refer to the various related courses on TrainingTools.com or use your search engine of choice. |
|
|
||||||||
|